I need legal advice

And for the record, you are equating a court ruling in your favor with "justice". The two are NOT the same.

I have been in the courtroom dozens of times. Some of those times the ruling was in my favor. Other times it was not. But I have NEVER been denied any constitutional right---and neither have you.

Just a typical arm chair pundit with nothing but tales of running amok of the law and who has, as a result, an armload of misplaced anger and a truck full of blame for everyone else but themselves.

Tiresome, really.
And I have NEVER said people who do not believe as me should leave. I said people who believe ANOTHER country is BETTER than this one should LIVE there. Makes sense. Why would you want to live in a place you did NOT believe in, love, and feel loyal to?

Well--besides to complain, that is?

OUCH!

For such a learned (supposedly) person, you have missed the point of how your four references become plagiarism... It is THAT copying of THEIR words without quotes that would have had your posting be Plagiarism... had it been a paper for your education. I'm not surprised though. I saw many papers in grad school that had been taken nearly verbatim from the internet... without even verifying that the source was an authority.

When it is not it gets really funny to read.

But you aren't writing a paper on here. You are just trying to appear learned by quoting other people without applying the quotes.

Thinking back, I can remember at least four times you have suggested that if I don't like it the way it is that I should leave... You've even suggested that I am NOT American. Creepy, but just like a lot of your other posts that suggest what could not possibly be true.

I can only suggest that if you don't like what I write, you should not read it.... or disparage it with words of other people who would never in a million years suggest that I don't have a right to say it... or that I should leave here.

Initiated is the word you are repeatedly typing. Try spelling it correctly.

Let me make sure I understand.

This is a MESSAGE BOARD/FORUM (not a BLOG). I made my own comments then said, "Here is a TUTORIAL" and put the links from whence the information came. And YOU want to complain because it isn't it APA formatting?? roflmao Hon, I don't know how to say this nicely, but only someone with the IQ of a jelly bean would NOT know that the LINKS in, before and AFTER the information is from whence the information came.
AND MUST I point out that this is NOT a research paper but an Internet forum? Just for fun GOOGLE some terms such as "message board" "copyright", etc. Guess what? It is NOT considered plagiarizing when you PROVIDE LINKS to the source of information. Look it up.

Here is just one example for you of "netiquette": It is acceptable to provide link to copyrighted material.....http://www.engineersedge.com/posting_policy.htm

You cannot make a parallel between a term paper and an FORUM (which you erroneously call a BLOG). Contemporary sources agree that providing a LINK to the place from whence the information came is NOT considered plagiarizing.

Smoke and mirrors, my dear. Subterfuge.
Find a single place I said anyone had to believe LIKE ME. I have not. I have said repeatedly if you or anyone else does not think that this is the greatest country on earth, it is ridiculous to stay here. Leave. If you REALLY think that, then LEAVE. Why would you want to stay?

Anyway, you seem to get confused when I ask to many questions, SO for the THIRD time let me REPEAT the question regarding the statements YOU made, but for some reason you don't want to discuss. Hmmmm...

Remember this gem?

I suspect you have not bothered to think about where our court system came from... and, therefore, what principles made it what it should have been but is not. I suspect the French have nearly the best.

I replied you are ENTIRELY correct. I have given NO thought to how the FRENCH system of government is superior to our own. Any thoughts?

Of course not. Because it isn't.

I won't even 're' ask my question about WHY you brought up the French government in this thread when you now state it is "irrelevant" to the posters issues. I already know---no reply.

You made a very surprising statement coming from someone who presumes to call themselves an American. The FRENCH system of government ( the one you erroneously called a DEMOCRACY when it is not) is better than ours?

Perhaps you could explain what you disparaged me for "not giving enough thought to"---you do remember that, don't you? "what principles made it what it should have been but is not. "
What principles?

ANYONE who sits in the comfort of their home in THIS country and disparages it and asserts it is NOT the best country on EARTH SHOULD leave. Period.
I NEVER said you were not FREE to spout such rhetoric. But, I , as any true blooded American will not simply stand by and listen to our country being disparaged and verbally attacked. It breaks my heart to know that young men and women DIE for you to sit here and complain about the home of the free BECAUSE of the brave. You should hang your head in abject shame.

Is it perfect? Far from it.

BUT its close enough that our military people DIE for it DAILY so people like YOU can sit at your computer and complain about your own mistakes that put you in juxtaposition with the law and you didn't like you didn't get your way in court. Blah bah blah, whine, whine, whine. Absolutely disgusting.

I am not surprised--this type of rhetoric coming from someone who feels the Constitution of our land should be abandoned in favor of a one world government.

Socialism. Marxism. Communism.

Bondage. Slavery. Corruption.

Disgusting. Totally and completely reprehensible.

roflmao while you're capitalizing the letter "I", perhaps you could go back to your OWN posting and capitalize Internet? Then, when you have completed that arduous task, try scrolling to your previous posting below and correcting "EXISTANT". I do believe you meant "existent"? Then, just for fun, try explaining what the word "onesuch" means. Did you mean "one such"?

Wait, wait, wait.........let me guess. NOW spelling is IRRELEVANT to the point of the poster's thread, right? (eyeroll)
And if you were writing a paper, the teacher would want to know why in the world you have 'you' in the middle of the sentence capitalized???
Not sure that SPELLING saber is one you wanted to rattle, Cupcake. How silly are you.
When you're done correcting your OWN spelling, perhaps you could address those "principles" to which you keep referring??

Oh, hey, maybe you could explain how FRANCE is a democracy?? I'd LOVE to read about that!

There you go again making up stuff I didn't say and ignoring what YOU DID SAY.

Sure, I'll let you plagiarize their material with just a hand pat, but don't think I will let anyone else think the non-quoted words were your own. You put them in a PERSONAL discussion... NOT directly theirs, but you used their words. To me that suggests you don't have the wherewithall to speak rationally without using someone else's words... misspelled?

I'm sure poster has seen enough of this discussion, so I'm abdicating my right to correct you.

Hon, do you honestly think you LET me DO anything? ROFL! And......* head knocking empty coconut sound* how in the love of Pete do you call this a PERSONAL DISCUSSION?

Dumpling, this is a PUBLIC MESSAGE BOARD--NOT a personal discussion. And--here is the real kick in the pants--even if it WERE a personal discussion--WHO uses APA FORMATTING in private discussions?? You are nuttier than a PAYDAY bar.

All the times you complain about ME being a spell checker, and then YOU do it? It's relevant only when you are trying to say SOMETHING--ANYTHING to void having it be so painfully obvious that you HAVE no defense of your comments. You are sitting here stating FRANCE is a democracy (which is clearly incorrect) and now you are going to "abdicate your right to correct me" ? I am SO using this entire thread ROFLMAO! You are famous--and you don't even know it.

Time for more Rx, isn't it??

I cited Internet sources that say it is PERFECTLY acceptable to provide LINKS to the source---which is what I did AND I prefaced my comments by calling them a TUTORIAL. I repeatedly admitted I did NOT know anything about the French that would make their rule of law superior and invited YOU to tell me.

Now, who, my little Jelly Bean, would think those were MY words?? (pointed look)

All of this fussing about a lack of quotation marks and a word that was not spelled correctly (nevermind YOUR "France is a democracy" and your repeated wrong words)---none of which, by the way, I bothered with until YOU rattled that saber.

YOU had to grasp at an incorrectly spelled word to avoid the issue of this thread---MISINFORMATION. France is NOT a democracy. They have no rule of law that is superior to ours. But you have NO ANSWER. SO you grovel up a word that erroneously had two "n's" in it and waved it wildly like the Holy Grail.

But still........NO answer.

You STILL have not provided one SHRED of proof to substantiate your anti-Americanism.

YOU degraded me for NOT "thinking about where our court system came from and what principles made it what is should have been but is not".
My question remains---since it was YOUR assertion--WHAT PRINCIPLES?
What principles do the French, over there in the "democracy" (cough) have that we do not?

Very simple question. Stop focusing on properly documented sources that make you look foolish with your "France is a democracy" and answer the question---it's YOUR statement. Defend it.
I suspect you have not bothered to think about where our court system came from... and, therefore, what principles made it what it should have been but is not. I suspect the French have nearly the best.

Name ONE single principle the French have that has resulted in a superior government, one without corruption, vice and greed.

You know its funny.......... the French form of government that YOU mentioned first was rendered "irrelevant" when I responded----you told me to stop focusing on "irrelevant" material. But it was relevant enough for you to BRING it UP in the first place.

Suddenly, silence............well, aside from the sound of whining, not unlike air escaping a balloon with a tiny hole.............silence.

Figures.

Anyone who would suggest a person should leave the U.S. because they don't like it when the powerful take advantage of others and speak against it is both supporting the rascals who do it AND is espousing anti American sentiment in ONE simple sentence. For a Lawyer in Training NOT to recognize that fact speaks ill of your professors.

It is NOT appropriate of you to suggest that someone who speaks out is Anti American... But if my reasoning is beyond your comprehension, I suggest you read the Bill of Rights.

You often show a contempt for other people's rights... this is just one more time. That said, I see no reason to accomodate your poorly phrased jeering by responding with an education... as I have done in the past... because you only continue to jeer without reading... or perhaps you still are having problems with that activity.

Sigh. Once more.

I NEVER said that someone who opposes corruption should leave the country. I said (do try to listen--this is rather embarrassing). ANYONE who feels that this is NOT the best country in the world HANDS DOWN should leave.

If you get confused again, try to reread that paragraph. I will not repeat it.

And, one more thought---THE FRENCH, with that great "democracy" (cough) that YOU call "the best"---do you think THEY take advantage of people? Do you think you must have MONEY to get justice there? (eyeroll).

I took your advice and I read again the Bill of Rights. Funny thing though--I don't see in there where it says those who find OTHER countries "the best" shouldn't feel free to move there.

I show contempt for peoples right?? THIS from a woman who told a man he deserved to LOSE his parental rights to his kid because he is a TRUCK DRIVER?? OH MY GOD. Outrageous!!!

IN any regard your ENTIRE posting has NOTHING to do with the * question*. Again, for your poorly contrived feigning, allow me to ASK the question again. (Gee, that's amazing....... all these times it's been asked and somehow you write back about my law school professors. *head scratch*)
YOU CRITICIZED me for not bothering : ".....to think about where our court system came from... and, therefore, what principles made it what it should have been but is not. I suspect the French have nearly the best."

I agreed. And I stand property chastized.

Now....... tell me. What principles "MADE it what it should have been but is not".


Name ONE single principle the French have that has resulted in a superior government, one without corruption, vice and greed. Just one.

It would appear as though YOU haven't given any thought to it either.

Know why? Because there ARE NONE.

Blah, blah, blah. Mindless rhetoric.

You explained YOUR personal animosity toward someone who complained that they didn't like what was happening in the court system... Since when is that NOT a PERSONAL OPINION OF YOURS?

Just how little attention do you pay before you go off on one of your colorful JELLYBEAN dripping commentaries?