Police entered my home with guns when I was sleeping and falsified a story

I scanned your post and you once again have proven your ignorance. I did not change anything I originally said. I am in IT Management and in my past I was a successful Litigator. Why does this bother you so? Jealous perhaps Matey? I have reviewed some of your advise to others and it is truly scary how you and your physic powers can determine outcome from producing past court decisions. The majority of cases are decided in hallways and lunches yet you feel the need to jack up posters and put the fear of past cases in the minds of people that need assistance.

Your last post was once again rubbish since you give legal advice with minimum knowledge of a situation or having any idea what is on the actual police report. You pray on others with no legal back ground other then (possibly) being a student. No I will not state 50 possibilities of outcomes based on any past findings simply because most cases are decided out of court.

Maybe if you were able to get out from under yourself once in awhile you may learn something.

To clarify I did not notice your roots but my girlfriend did when she peaked over my shoulder and asked "why would someone like that" plaster her own picture as wallpaper? So I guess it stuck.
I am flattered you are flattered but you are sooooooooooooooooooooo far from my type I would have to decline your invitation as our past or current relationship has never worked.

Well sunshine I have to get to my ASP baton update course. Try not to trip over your own feet today.

As a footnote to others, Please get advise from others before making any legal decision (more then one or two others).
Learn about the attorney and look under the hood (sort of speak) before you hire an attorney. Go to court and watch the attorney you have in mind actually work others cases to see if that is someone you would want working for you.

Quote a single time I predicted the outcome of ANY trial. Copy and paste my words right here. __________________________________________________ ___

Actually what I said ( after explaining in detail what the LAW says about civil liability-which was the POINT of this particular thread) was that based on that law, my OPINION was that she did not have a case. But, I also said take EVERYTHING said here, including my own postings to an attorney and seek legal counsel. Psychic? pfffttt...... How can they go to court and watch the attorney litigate, when "cases are adjudicated in hallways at lunch"? LOL

YOU CANNOT PREDICT THE OUTCOME OF A TRIAL BASED ON PRECEDENT, but YOU CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT YOUR RIGHTS ARE PERTAINING TO THE SAME by understanding how the courts have ruled in the past. Any successful litigator ( snort ) knows what laws have been already passed and how they relate to the case against or for his client.

REREAD ABOVE, SKIPPY.


Possibilities of outcomes? What does that mean? There are two possible outcomes--WIN or LOSE. (pausing a moment for weighty reflection).
What does plea bargaining have to do with furthering an understanding of case law? Also, plea bargaining has nothing to do with CIVIL LAW, which is the POINT of this posting---NOT criminal. So, there is no way for this case to be "solved in the hallway". Surely a fine attorney such as yourself understands that. (lmao)

IF MY ANSWER IS INCORRECT, WHY DONT YOU PROVIDE THE CORRECT LEGAL ANSWER INSTEAD OF COMMENTING ON ME PERSONALLY? Answer that, SKIPPER.

No one here provides POLICE REPORTS--the purpose of this forum is to discuss GENERAL LEGAL PRINCIPLE and (pay attention) CASE LAW.

You don't need a POLICE REPORT to provide a tutorial on what the LAW states regarding civil liability in general--the issue at hand. If understanding precedent is "fear mongering", you are worse off than I thought. Guess what attorneys base their cases on? CASE LAW. Precedent. Guess what judges base their rulings on? CASE LAW. Precedent.

What do you think the Supreme Court does?? IT REVIEWS the relevance and application of PAST LAW and subseqently upholds past decisions, or conversely, overturns the same.

Perhaps you better notify the Supreme Court of your successful past as a stellar litigator, and chide them for their silly interest in the relevance of case law. roflmao

You are no attorney. Attorneys spend YEARS and thousands of dollars---doing---guess what? STUDYING MEMORIZING and UNDERSTANDING the NUANCES OF CASE LAW. No attorney would tell you "cases are settled in hallways". That, Sir, degrades what it means to be an attorney. And as someone who has a graduate degree in criminal law and is in law school, anyone who has the dedication to travel this path does so with reverence and respect for that which has gone before.

If you are an attorney (who cannot tell the difference between advise and advice, or "than" and "then", or "pray" and "prey", an attorney who has yet to reference ANY case law relevant to ANY posters question), then I am Mother Goose.

My challenge remains the same. Cite a SINGLE legally relevant thought on ANY posting in this forum. You have yet to cite a single relevant law, precedent, or even discuss what the LAW SAYS regarding ANY posters question.

Explaining to the poster the law regarding Civil Liability isn't FEAR MONGERING---- it gives her in the information she needs to levy a million dollar lawsuit against the state. FEAR? Ummm, 'kay. If you say so.

If you have no respect for what happens in a court room, why are you here?

Oh, and stop private messaging me. I am not going to answer. I suspect your girl friend would not approve.

I'm supposed to "stick to the issue at hand"? I'm attempting to discuss case law and you want to chat about my personal WEB pages and my HAIR of all things? I'm stunned you would care enough to not only take the time to view it in the first place, but also comment on it in yet ANOTHER posting. Out of TEN postings you have made, TWO of them reference my personal appearance. Here is a thought---WHO CARES about the color of my hair? I suspect no one--besides you. MY ONLY INVITATION to you was to ask you to post a SINGLE LEGALLY RELEVANT thought dealing with Section 1983, the POINT of this posting.
I still don't understand what my APPEARANCE has to do with ANY of this----(And my background on my web page is BLACK AND WHITE --no brown roots---my hair isn't brown and has never been--it is BLACK) and your comments regarding "our relationship" or "MY INVITATION" ( to do WHAT??) is disrespectful, especially to a recent widow whose husband of twenty years burned to death in a horrific fiery car crash. You are personally repulsive and offensive and your comments border on sexual harassment. You have no cause to address my physical appearance and suggest inappropriate, offensive and disgusting s3xual conduct on my part(i.e. "MY INVITATION"--wth), especially since YOU are insisting upon private messaging Me. To suggest otherwise is harassment with definite s3xual and inappropriate overtones on your part.

STAND DOWN.

OVER 90 PERCENT OF DECISIONS OUR DECIDED OUT OF THE COURT ROOM.

Shhh, Some historical Court Houses are not in use any more, imagine that.

What do you find the need to sort. I never found that cute. LOL

Why would I read your post again Matey, I barely scanned it the first time. When your rubbish hits the fan in the first few lines I barely look at the rest simply because you have shown your limited knowledge and ignorance.

Oh and if you want people to think your hair is blond that's up to you but why hide who you are? Enough about yourself OK? me me me me, always about you. sheesh

Tata and walka walka, Have a wonderful weekend.

OMG.. along with your other glaring misuses of the English language, now you cannot discern between "OUR" and "ARE"?

"90 percent of cases ARE ( not OUR) determined out of court". THIRD grade grammar. You are an attorney's syntactical and grammatical nightmare.

BUT, since YOU brought it up, lets discuss it.

What does over 90% of cases being plea bargained have to do with a CIVIL LAWSUIT regarding SECTION 1983? You cannot PLEA BARGAIN a CIVIL case. AND how can it be SETTLED out ( or in, for that matter) court without the parties UNDERSTANDING THE LAW regarding the same?

You think that because cases are settled out of court, the poster isn't entitled to UNDERSTAND the LAW that GOVERNS not only the case, but the OUTCOME, whether it goes to trial or not?

AND, since you ( again) mentioned it ( for some bizarre reason) lets discuss it:
My HAIR again? I didn't say my hair was naturally BLONDE. I said it WASNT BROWN ( your first comment was "brown roots") --its naturally BLACK--JET black and now it is platinum blonde from a large plastic bottle. Again, you have twelve postings and THREE of them waste bandwidth referencing my HAIR---and you don't want me to respond to your drivel? STOP bringing it up.

Being ACCURATE isn't "sorting". The law is about PRECISION and ACCURACY. It is clear you are simply a person with an axe to grind against those in the legal field so you are a flamer, nothing else, degrading the dignity and respect that the law deserves, offered in reverence by those who study it, love it, and practice it.

So far, you have given THREE legal suggestions and they have ALL been incorrect--and I have proven why and posted links and case law proving the same. I haven't just tittered "you are incorrect, blah blah". I've PROVEN it.

You still didn't answer the question ( big surprise). If a courthouse is historical, or being in use at the moment, it doesn't CHANGE the fact that it was USED or IS BEING used for the same reason---LEGAL reasons. Do you really think it is important to tell posters to go to the courthouse that is being USED and not the one that is a MONUMENT or TOURIST attraction to have current legal issues resolved? <gawd>

IF a court house is "retired" (i.e. no longer in use) it is STILL a LEGAL courthouse----its PURPOSE hasn't changed. It doesn't become a MEDICAL courthouse or an EDUCATIONAL courthouse. It is STILL related to LEGAL issues. How poorly done of you not to acknowledge yet another insipid remark.

You keep telling me I am wrong---BUT YOU HAVE YET TO CITE A SINGLE LAW, PRECEDENT or AUTHORITY TO PROVE IT.

No, it ISNT about me---that's precisely WHY I am admonishing you to STOP INNITIATING ( STARTING, BEGINNING) conversations about irrelevant things such as my HAIR and post one LEGAL authoritative source that shows how anything I have posted here is incorrect, as a matter of law.

You are still taking the time to respond and attack me personally, but YOU STILL haven't PROVEN that a single thing I have said is wrong besides whining "you are incorrect" and blathering about my hair, of all things ( third posting mentioning it) .

PROVE it. Just once. Prove it. You blather on about this and that, and when I prove that you are incorrect from the law, and authoritative legal sources, you tell me you don't "sort". LOL Umm, 'kay.

Stop flaming and harassing people who actually are answering legal questions with accurate, factual information. If I am wrong, post WHY and PROVE it. That is why we are here. To learn.

Is it your job to correct the grammar of everyone on the internet. Don't you have any life at all. Choosing to take all this time to research and write about a unknown poster makes you a joke and oh soooooo many have shared with me how funny it is that you can't be "grown up" enough to just stem aside.

EEK I really don't have the time for a lax under educated stubborn want to bes like yourself WHO GIVES INCORRECT LEGAL ADVICE. I have received personal thank you's from more then one reader and we find it hilarious that you find the time for such trivial pursuits. Don't you realize that no one knows who I am and you spend all this time trying to defend yourself with mini internet searches and possible lab research. You are ridiculous and your legal Mombo Jumbo is NOT to be taken at face value. You are in no way any assistance to this forum. You are a detriment to others and it is scary that you opinion is even allowed. Someone on the internet has to put write incorrect information and I guess you made it your responsibility to be one of these people. READERS, LOOK FARTHER IN THIS AND OTHER FORUMS FOR YOUR ANSWERS. THIS WOMAN IS A WANNABE AND DOES NOT CARE WHEN SHE OFFERS INCORRECT LEGAL ADVICE.

And I think my English is pretty good as a second language

If you are really a law student Gentle shouldn't you be in school? You spend a large amount of time on these boards when you really should be in a classroom or at the very least in the library studying. True it may be the summer right now but what about the months preceding this one?

Focus on studying the law and not correcting people's spelling and punctuation! You are giving us attorney's a bad name by claiming to almost be one.

Move on please.