LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums     
Find A Lawyer Now!
Legal Forum

Go Back   LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums > Personal Injury and Accident Law Forum > Malpractice
User Name
Password Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Find a Lawyer Now By Category:
Family & Divorce Criminal Defense Job & Employment Personal Injury
Real Estate Lawyers Immigration Business Lawyers Other Lawyers
Be assured that LegalMatch is Fast, Free and Confidential
Not Ready To Hire an Expert Lawyer? Get Online Legal Documents
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2006, 01:19 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2
Default could this be a malpractice case?...

My daughter was born in Dec 2004, normal pregnancy, normal delivery, right on time, etc. She was diagnosed w/a rare disease (effects 1 in about 80,000 but this number has been as low as 1 in 47,000), still pretty rare. Anyway, they did an initial blood screen at the hospital and we were sent home after 2 days. When she was 7 days old we had to take her into the NICU because she's deathly allergic to milk products and we had given her breast milk and some formula for less than 3 days of her life. The test results weren't given to us for at least 5 days after she was born. The hospital doesn't do the testing on sight, they have to ship it out to a lab off site. They have since begun using a courier service to get test results in less than a day (24 hour turnaround). We are now in debt to the hospital for her medical bills to the NICU. I can't help but think if we had been given the service that all new patients recieve now, we could have avoided the entire situation as the medical staff diagnosed her problems as related to galactosemia. She was in the NICU for 4 days and I missed a weeks pay at work. She was very close to dieing and although I totally think the NICU doctors saved her life, I think the whole thing could have been avoided and it is really painful for us to think about it, and it was a very difficult time in my families lives.

That said, I've never been too litigeous, but I really don't want to pay the thousands of dollars we owe to the hospital for something that is now avoidable. Thoughts?

Last edited by mthedude : 09-18-2006 at 01:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2006, 03:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mthedude
My daughter was born in Dec 2004, normal pregnancy, normal delivery, right on time, etc. She was diagnosed w/a rare disease (effects 1 in about 80,000 but this number has been as low as 1 in 47,000), still pretty rare. Anyway, they did an initial blood screen at the hospital and we were sent home after 2 days. When she was 7 days old we had to take her into the NICU because she's deathly allergic to milk products and we had given her breast milk and some formula for less than 3 days of her life. The test results weren't given to us for at least 5 days after she was born. The hospital doesn't do the testing on sight, they have to ship it out to a lab off site. They have since begun using a courier service to get test results in less than a day (24 hour turnaround). We are now in debt to the hospital for her medical bills to the NICU. I can't help but think if we had been given the service that all new patients recieve now, we could have avoided the entire situation as the medical staff diagnosed her problems as related to galactosemia. She was in the NICU for 4 days and I missed a weeks pay at work. She was very close to dieing and although I totally think the NICU doctors saved her life, I think the whole thing could have been avoided and it is really painful for us to think about it, and it was a very difficult time in my families lives.

That said, I've never been too litigeous, but I really don't want to pay the thousands of dollars we owe to the hospital for something that is now avoidable. Thoughts?
1. Medical procedures continually march forward and onward. Medical testing and turnaround time is valid at the time of the procedures. All because procedures and testing may have improved, doesn't mean that you're entitled to the benefits of that improvement.

2. Where is your insurance?

Last edited by Westside Law : 09-18-2006 at 03:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2006, 08:39 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Westside Law
1. Medical procedures continually march forward and onward. Medical testing and turnaround time is valid at the time of the procedures. All because procedures and testing may have improved, doesn't mean that you're entitled to the benefits of that improvement.

2. Where is your insurance?
We had insurance but the out of pocket costs are still a few thousand dollars, it's cost about %5k a day to have her in the NICU so insurance only pickes up so much.

I know that the medical world is ever advancing but my point was that, the technology existed at the time to test her the same day, it was the hospital that chose not to offer the service so it's almost like we don't have a choice because all the hospitals in the area are part of the same network so they didn't offer the service. I know that means they didn't discriminate but it's almost like they were negligent to offer a service that was medically nescessary to avoid the situation we were in. They offer the service now but only because they chose to pay a courier service to run the labs back and forth.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 12:25 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Default lab tests

I know that this was a very scary time for you, but I'm glad that your baby is doing okay now.
I work in the obstetrical field and can tell you that the test that diagnosed your baby's galactosemia is mandated by the state. It's called Newborn Screening, and it screens for several different disorders. It was originally called the PKU test, but later was expanded to include other diseases. The test can't be done until the baby is 24 hours old, after the baby is feeding. The screening is based on how the baby metabolizes food, and reveals any metabolic problems, like galactosemia, hypothyroid, PKU, and several other diseases.
You are right that there is sometimes a delay in having the test analyzed. Once the baby is 24 hours old, the blood is drawn, and then mailed to the State Health testing center. They analyze the test there, and then notify the baby's pediatrician. There can be a lag time along any of these steps. Also, if the pediatrician doesn't have your correct phone number and address, and the MD can't get in touch with you, this can endanger the baby.
Hopefully, the time line can be shortened for all these steps now that they are using a courier.
I hope that this helps you understand why things might have taken so long. As to the excessive amount of charges, I can tell you that the Neonatal ICU is very expensive, even with insurance. Have you asked for an itemized bill? Perhaps you can contest some of the charges that you feel excessive, or that you know your baby didn't receive.

Last edited by chr2554 : 01-17-2008 at 12:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:30 PM.

Find a Lawyer | Attorney Search by City/State | Law Library
Estate Lawyers | DUI-DWI Lawyers | Divorce Lawyers | Criminal Lawyers
Expungement Lawyers | Business Lawyers | Government Lawyers | Family Law Lawyers  
Real Estate Lawyers | Employment Lawyers | Bankruptcy Lawyers | Foreclosure Lawyers 
Personal Injury Lawyers | Child Support Lawyers | Child Visitation Lawyers | Child Custody Lawyers 
Immigration Lawyers | Landlord/Tenant Lawyers | Defective Products Lawyers | Christian Attorneys
Attorney Referral Services | Intellectual Property Lawyers | Bar Association Lawyers

Attorney Advertising | Law Firm Financing
LegalMatch Reviews | LegalMatch Forums | LegalMatch Family Lawyers | LegalMatch PR
LegalMatch in Austin | LegalMatch Life | LegalMatch Affiliate Program


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©1999-2008 LegalMatch. All rights reserved. LegalMatch®, the LegalMatch
logo, and the tradedress are trademarks of LegalMatch. Patents Pending.