LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums  
Find A Lawyer Now!
Legal Forum
Go Back   LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums > Criminal Law Forum > Criminal Procedure
User Name
Password Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


  Find a Lawyer Now By Category:
  Family & Divorce Criminal Defense Job & Employment Personal Injury
  Real Estate Lawyers Immigration Business Lawyers Other Lawyers
LegalMatch is Fast, Free and Confidential
Not Ready To Hire an Expert Lawyer? Get Online Legal Documents
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2009, 10:57 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8
dna and probation --concern

I have been on probation since June 2009 with the US probation office for a NON violent crime, which I pleaded guilty to save legal fees and I even helped and witnessed for the US government.

I was told by my probation officer that they will need to take a DNA sample soon.

I am NOT afraid of anything from my past as I have never done anything to worry about DNA haunting me. However based on my past experience with the "judicial" system and knowing computers and those "very educated" persons in charge of data entry...I worry of being falsely matched with some past or future crime I did not commit.

Any thoughts anyone?

Thank you and GOD bless
Reply With Quote
Find a Lawyer Now!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2009, 01:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,504
Send a message via AIM to GentleGrace
Interesting posting and perspective. Most people who have 'done nothing' would WANT their DNA taken. I will tell you why.

Eyewitness testimony can be faulty. Video tape can even be misleading. Other types of evidence can be flawed based on the experience of the person collecting it and how it is preserved. DNA, however, is so precise it is a virtual impossibility for it to be wrong.

This week I was reading about a police dog who identified another cop as a killer. However, DNA proved that the dog was wrong! Without the DNA, the cop would have gone to jail because of the 'evidence' against him. DNA, as far as I know, has never been proven to be incorrect, whereas animals, witnesses, and testimony have, unfortunately and even at times, routinely proven faulty.

While it is a violation of privacy for the government to collect DNA samples of random citizens, it is legal for them to take samples from those who have been convicted of a crime.

If your concern really is that DNA may be wrong based on the person handling it, the argument doesn't make sense because those same people "handle all" the material. It may help to read up on what DNA is and exactly how it works. Perhaps that will make you feel better. If, however, your concern is your DNA matching evidence from some other crime, I would consult with an attorney.
Reply With Quote
Find a Lawyer Now!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2009, 01:41 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8
thank you

hello
thank you for the reply. I am NOT concerned at all as I know I have nothingto worry about. I am just concerned (i guess it my paronia from being falsely accused and than expunged in the past) that I get falsely accused again...
thats all
Not to mention my experience has shown me that the justice system , especially the police are 90% corrupt
Reply With Quote
Find a Lawyer Now!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2009, 01:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,504
Send a message via AIM to GentleGrace
Well, you certainly are entitled to your opinion and in your situation that may have been the case. But, I have met literally hundreds, if not more, of conscientious respectful officers of the law and the court who conduct their (at times life threatening) duties with dignity and honor.

On their behalf, I would suggest you not make blanket statements about an entire group of people. It is no more fair than to say an entire race, or an entire gender is a particular way. In your case, they may have been unfair, or dishonest, but statistically and even equitably speaking, it isn't rational to say that the experience of one person is indicative of an entire group of people numbering in the hundreds of thousands.
I am sure you would object to a statement such as "Everyone who has been convicted of a crime should be in jail".........or "Everyone who has been convicted of a crime is a horrible worthless person". While that may be the case some of the time, obviously, it is unfair to say that about everyone----and I am sure you would object to that classification, as would the cops you have never seen nor met.
Good luck.
Reply With Quote
Find a Lawyer Now!
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:17 PM.

County Lawyers | Attorney Search by City
DWI Lawyers | Estate Lawyers | Criminal Lawyers
Expungement Lawyers | Business Lawyers | Government Lawyers | Family Law Lawyers
Real Estate Lawyers | Employment Lawyers | Bankruptcy Lawyers | Foreclosure Lawyers
Personal Injury Lawyers | Child Visitation Lawyers | Child Custody Lawyers
Immigration Lawyers | Landlord/Tenant Lawyers | Defective Product Lawyers | Christian Attorneys
Attorney Referral Services | Intellectual Property Lawyers | Bar Association Lawyers


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©1999-2008 LegalMatch. All rights reserved. LegalMatch®, the LegalMatch
logo, and the tradedress are trademarks of LegalMatch. Patents Pending.