LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums     
Find A Lawyer Now!
Legal Forum

Go Back   LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums > Criminal Law Forum > Criminal Procedure
User Name
Password Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Find a Lawyer Now By Category:
Family & Divorce Criminal Defense Job & Employment Personal Injury
Real Estate Lawyers Immigration Business Lawyers Other Lawyers
Be assured that LegalMatch is Fast, Free and Confidential
Not Ready To Hire an Expert Lawyer? Get Online Legal Documents
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008, 02:56 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4
Default Help please need to know if its worth the fight.

My husband when he was 17 got drunk these girls had been trying to get with him all day.After a heavy night of drinking with friends they had alegedly had ***. she also stated that she had *** with another person that night she was 12.He was sentenced to 86 months stayed EJJ and no rape kit was ever done.This is what has happened since then. He took off when he was 20 and they executed his 86 months then added ten years conditional release Question 1 Is it legal at a parole revocation hearing to add on to ones sentence? Question 2 since there was no Rape kit done and the girl stated that she had had *** with another person that night can he even have been charged with the crime without proof ? i have read that in the state of Minnesota that proof of sexual penetration must be established. any advice or legal help would be much appreciated thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008, 04:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,620
Send a message via AIM to GentleGrace
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kasey_walberg View Post
My husband when he was 17 got drunk these girls had been trying to get with him all day.After a heavy night of drinking with friends they had alegedly had ***. she also stated that she had *** with another person that night she was 12.He was sentenced to 86 months stayed EJJ and no rape kit was ever done.This is what has happened since then. He took off when he was 20 and they executed his 86 months then added ten years conditional release Question 1 Is it legal at a parole revocation hearing to add on to ones sentence? Question 2 since there was no Rape kit done and the girl stated that she had had *** with another person that night can he even have been charged with the crime without proof ? i have read that in the state of Minnesota that proof of sexual penetration must be established. any advice or legal help would be much appreciated thank you.
S3x or s3xual conduct with a 12 year old is a crime. Period. Whether one or two people engaged in the activity that night, it doesn't matter. If your husband did, then it doesn't matter if someone else did. The case was adjudicated, right?

What do you mean he 'took off' when he was 20 ? What do you mean by 'executed his 86 months'? Question 1: Yes it is legal. Question 2: at the time the case was tried, he evidentally admitted he had s3x or s3xual contact with the child. The Minnesota law you are referring to has to do with adult rape---not child rape. I don't think there is any qustion about his having this inappropriate contact. In any regard, the case has been adjudicated and decided. I am not sure you can challenge it at this particular juncture.

What are you trying to accomplish? Where is he currently?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2008, 09:14 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GentleGrace View Post
S3x or s3xual conduct with a 12 year old is a crime. Period. Whether one or two people engaged in the activity that night, it doesn't matter. If your husband did, then it doesn't matter if someone else did. The case was adjudicated, right?

What do you mean he 'took off' when he was 20 ? What do you mean by 'executed his 86 months'? Question 1: Yes it is legal. Question 2: at the time the case was tried, he evidentally admitted he had s3x or s3xual contact with the child. The Minnesota law you are referring to has to do with adult rape---not child rape. I don't think there is any qustion about his having this inappropriate contact. In any regard, the case has been adjudicated and decided. I am not sure you can challenge it at this particular juncture.

What are you trying to accomplish? Where is he currently?
dosent matter thanks for the adivce blessed be.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Find a Lawyer | Attorney Search by City/State | Law Library
Estate Lawyers | DUI-DWI Lawyers | Divorce Lawyers | Criminal Lawyers
Expungement Lawyers | Business Lawyers | Government Lawyers | Family Law Lawyers  
Real Estate Lawyers | Employment Lawyers | Bankruptcy Lawyers | Foreclosure Lawyers 
Personal Injury Lawyers | Child Support Lawyers | Child Visitation Lawyers | Child Custody Lawyers 
Immigration Lawyers | Landlord/Tenant Lawyers | Defective Products Lawyers | Christian Attorneys
Attorney Referral Services | Intellectual Property Lawyers | Bar Association Lawyers

Attorney Advertising | Law Firm Financing
LegalMatch Reviews | LegalMatch Forums | LegalMatch Family Lawyers | LegalMatch PR
LegalMatch in Austin | LegalMatch Life | LegalMatch Affiliate Program


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©1999-2008 LegalMatch. All rights reserved. LegalMatch®, the LegalMatch
logo, and the tradedress are trademarks of LegalMatch. Patents Pending.