LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums     
Find A Lawyer Now!
Legal Forum

Go Back   LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums > Criminal Law Forum > Criminal Procedure
User Name
Password Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Find a Lawyer Now By Category:
Family & Divorce Criminal Defense Job & Employment Personal Injury
Real Estate Lawyers Immigration Business Lawyers Other Lawyers
Be assured that LegalMatch is Fast, Free and Confidential
Not Ready To Hire an Expert Lawyer? Get Online Legal Documents
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2005, 08:54 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Default Interview with handcuffs

my wife was taken to the police station for questioning, when she asked if she was being arrested they said no, but they handcuffed her anyway due to procedure. is this right? also since she wasnt being arrested is any information obtained without her consent, they took her wallet & cellphone, admissable as evidence?

Last edited by Carter : 07-07-2005 at 08:59 AM. Reason: edit
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2005, 09:53 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 456
Lightbulb Carter,

Typically here is the deal when it comes to questioning or interrogation.

There are two types of interrogations. The non-custodial interrogation and the custodial interrogation. The non-custodial interrogation is when you are brought to the police station but they don't consider you to be in police custody. This means that you are free to leave at any time. This sounds like the non-custodial interrogation is what they wanted your wife to believe she was there for.

The custodial interrogation is when the police are interrogating you and you are not free to leave. If they had your wife handcuffed then I would argue that she was definitely not free to leave. Also, if they had her cell phone and wallet that may be another argument that she was not free to leave.

The non-custodial interrogation does not require Miranda Rights to be read. The custodial interrogation does require that the police read you your rights. Was your wife read her rights? From the information you provided I would guess not. Not being read her rights and being interrogated and not free to leave may be considered an illegal interrogation. Typically, evidence obtained directly as a result of the illegal interrogation cannot be used as evidence against your wife. Also, any statements made during the interrogation many be excluded at trial if she is charged with anything.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2005, 01:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Default Thank you.

My wife states that at no time did the police officers let her leave, the detectives would answer her cell phone & went through her wallet. I spoke with the detective when the detective answered my wife's cellphone they did state she was not under arrest.

Specifically in Illinois anything that was obtained as a result of this interview as far as information should be inadmissible? ie credit card, ebay, paypal accounts & records. am I safe to assume this?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2005, 01:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 456
Default Interrogation

Carter, Unfortunately I do not reside in Illinois and am not versed in the laws of that state. In many states if the police are found to have been involved in a custodial interrogation and did not read the suspect their rights evidence obtained MAY be inadmissable.

For more specific questions you will want to speak to an attorney in your area for legal advice.

Thanks.

Last edited by legaleagle : 07-07-2005 at 02:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2005, 01:52 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Default thank you again

would you recommend anyone in Chicago, Il.?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2005, 04:37 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 13
Thumbs up Illinois Attorneys

I used the site that we are on now, legalmatch.com, and found an attorney in my area. Just follow the steps.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2006, 10:33 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Default Handcuffs

as far as information should be inadmissible? ie credit card, ebay, paypal accounts & records. am I safe to assume this?[/quote]


I am just curious but what was she arrested for ? You mention Ebay and credit cards and paypal ? Was this a fraud case ?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:15 PM.

Find a Lawyer | Attorney Search by City/State | Law Library
Estate Lawyers | DUI-DWI Lawyers | Divorce Lawyers | Criminal Lawyers
Expungement Lawyers | Business Lawyers | Government Lawyers | Family Law Lawyers  
Real Estate Lawyers | Employment Lawyers | Bankruptcy Lawyers | Foreclosure Lawyers 
Personal Injury Lawyers | Child Support Lawyers | Child Visitation Lawyers | Child Custody Lawyers 
Immigration Lawyers | Landlord/Tenant Lawyers | Defective Products Lawyers | Christian Attorneys
Attorney Referral Services | Intellectual Property Lawyers | Bar Association Lawyers

Attorney Advertising | Law Firm Financing
LegalMatch Reviews | LegalMatch Forums | LegalMatch Family Lawyers | LegalMatch PR
LegalMatch in Austin | LegalMatch Life | LegalMatch Affiliate Program


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©1999-2008 LegalMatch. All rights reserved. LegalMatch®, the LegalMatch
logo, and the tradedress are trademarks of LegalMatch. Patents Pending.