Go Back   LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums > Law Forums > Criminal Law
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Find a Lawyer Now By Category:
Family & Divorce Criminal Defense Job & Employment Personal Injury LegalMatch on Facebook
  Real Estate Lawyers Immigration Business Lawyers Other Lawyers LegalMatch on Twitter
LegalMatch is Fast, Free and Confidential
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2009, 10:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5
Wink Loophole? Telephone vs Cell in harassment charge (short)

I was charged and arrested for 4 text messages I sent to my former spouse. His wife filed charges. My arrest warrant (not police report) states only that "(I) called the home of (wife) with the intent to harass (wife)".

The charge I was listed as violating was "harassment by telephone" under sec 720ILcs.

However, IL has a specific section after that on "harassment through electronic communication."

(b) As used in this Act:
(1) "Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, images, sounds, data or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectric or photo-optical system.


I think a cell, TECHNICALLY would fall under the electronic category. TECHNICALLY, I think it could mean I was arrested on the wrong charges. Might be a far stretch, but technicalities seem to be the way to go lately.
I think the officer may have written down the incorrect statute code.

Being that there are two different sections, one for telephones and one for all other electronic means of communication, could I attempt to have the harassment charges dismissed based solely on the fact that a cell phone was used, as opposed to telephone? Very curious about this.
michelle29 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2009, 05:27 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,930
Send a message via AIM to GentleGrace
Good thinking, but no, it means the same thing. Cell phone, telephone, pay phone--all the same.

I successfully had a woman prosecuted for usage of her cell phone for sending text messages and vulgar photo images under the telephone laws in my state.
__________________
Grace

To ERR is human.
To FORGIVE is divine.
NEITHER is my policy.
GentleGrace is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©1999-2008 LegalMatch. All rights reserved. LegalMatch®, the LegalMatch
logo, and the tradedress are trademarks of LegalMatch. Patents Pending.