What do I do?

I recently found out that someome had stollen my debit/visa card. She withdrew large amounts of cash the banks say they dont keep survalliance tapes that long! The police in this small town won't take a police report ,even refused to listen to the voicemail where she admits she owes money!! Now my phone erased the message but their are people that heard it including one cop that told me to turn it of and my banker who cont to say he's working on it.. I do have a copy of a charge she made on my credit card for sintetic urine!!! But I don't know what to do with this since the police won't help!!!! She's a known druggy and under CPS investigation! And rumor is shes a snitch for the police. She's a con artist and uses her kids to make you feel sorry for her. Sad but true. I was dumb and trusted her I have checkes where I paid her day care and a check to her. If anyone can help me I would be so grateful. this has caused problems with my marriage and the relationship with my kids and family because thet blame me and think I'm a dumby that should have seen her sneaky ways.. I felt sorry for her but not sorry enough to give her my debit card!!!! Someone please help me if you can! She's got to be stopped before she gets someone else which she will I'm not the first just the biggest pay off so far! :

How much time transpired between her taking the card and your attempting to report this theft? What reason are they giving you for refusing to take a police report---do you have a criminal past that is making them disbelieve you?

Also if she withdrew cash, they should have asked for ID from her. Something in all of this doesn't add up.

Is the fact you admit you have given her money BEFORE affecting your ability to address this matter? Are the police saying they believe you GAVE her this money?

Also, the message on your phone should have been saved. I have recorded messages to my computer to save them when I have needed them for various prosecutions.

Something here doesn't add up. Maybe if you "fill in the blanks" so to speak, it will make more sense.

There must be a reason they are not believing you---did this person snitch ON you to the police and they think you are just doing this out of retaliation?

And, the SPAM link below is what happens when the spammers postings are removed, but they are not banned.

THEY RETURN. And violate the terms of service again. I would suggest not clicking on any spam link---and if you hover your mouse over the link, you can see it is a URL on YAHOO, a free server which would not be considered a reputable source of information, but rather a free server where people can manufacture and disseminate their OWN malware----very different from a known trusted secure site such as state hosted DMV site, for example.

Perhaps the irony of clicking a link on the internet, to THIS site, for example, to assert never to click on links because they are hijacked from time to time escapes you.

Most state web sites, as well as other sites such as DMV sites, etc. are highly secure encrypted web sites. And the instances of their being hijacked are next to nothing.

For that matter---everyone clicks on a link to get to THIS site. Clicking a link to a state DMV is no more riskier than the link you clicked to get to THIS site.

There are many safeguards of Internet usage. I have been online for 12 years and have NEVER caught a virus. I have the best anti virus available, and other protections in place. Of course, this medium is risky--it is what it is. But to click on a link to GET here then decry the safety of OTHER links (when this site as well as your personal computer has software to protect it) is silly.

This is an informational web site. Without the ability to direct users to where they can have their questions answered, it becomes little more than an opinion blog. And as I have stated before, people don't care about opinions. They come here for FACTS.

The internet is what you make of it. If you are too scared to click on links in reputable forum, don't click on the link that brought you here, presumably for information, in the first place.

In one posting you say I give spammers a hard time about URLs. NOW you say I am saying ALL URLS are fine.

I never said that.

How did you get "you are telling everyone all websites are fine" from this statement I made, " Of course, this medium is risky--it is what it is. "

If you cannot disagree with me, you MAKE UP SOMETHING I didn't say, assert I said it, THEN disagree with yourself ROFL!!!

I said it is ironic that you CLICK on a link to get to THIS site. AND while you are here, you click on dozens of links to OTHER areas of this site. Could they have a virus? Sure, not likely, but it could happen.

It is no more possible that the sites I use for information ( expertlaw.com, official DMV web sites, etc) have viruses than this site where you click, click , click to navigate between topics on this forum.

If you are so worried, why are you clicking on ANY? It is silly to assert the ones I publish (as the user of this forum with the most time and effort invested in it) are virus filled, when there is no more likelihood of that than one of the official LEGALMATCH links having a virus.

Your motivation is clear.

Silly, but clear.

EVERY site is risky. Because you COME to this one regularly makes it LESS of a risk? How silly of you.


Allow me to quote from my PREVIOUS posting--only PART of which YOU highlighted, IGNORING the rest.

"I have been online for 12 years and have NEVER caught a virus. I have the best anti virus available, and other protections in place. Of course, this medium is risky--it is what it is."

Where do I tell a poster WITHOUT VIRUS PROTECTION to click on ANYTHING? I do not. I STRESS the IMPORTANCE of having virus protection at ANY site and for ANY link. AND I stress "THIS MEDIUM IS RISKY".

How YOU see a lack of LOGIC in there is puzzling.

Also, you make a funny statement " I don't think THIS site is virus ridden, because I get on it regularly."

WOW.........the fact you COME to this site often makes it SAFE?

The TRUTH is, this site is equally as capable of getting a virus as is , say for example, the MARYLAND DMV site. Just because you CLICK on this site regularly MAKES it SAFER?? ROFL!!

And there is no such thing as "vetting" a web site. (eyeroll) Technical term, eh? Vetting those web sites for safety. I, for one, would LOVE to read a tutorial on how WEB SITES are "VETTED". Riveting, I'm sure. Perhaps you could provide an explanation on the fine art of VETTING WEB SITES. (snort)

Re read my posting.

I said I had a good virus scanner. Obviously, if you do not, you are NOT protected. AND I said this MEDIUM IS RISKY.

How you read lechery and trickery into that is a reflection on the warbled debauchery inside your head---and NOT a reflection on what I said.

* HAND PAT*

'Tis ok, hon.

Your motives are apparent in very posting you make.

Repeating it over and over isn't going to 1. make your answers correct or 2. keep people from reading the truth I provide them in this forum.

Of course you don't want people to trust the links provided here---you WANT to reduce this site a bickering match. Without proof of what the law says, that's all this site is.

This site was more than that before you, it will be more than that after you. Never fear.

This site will survive you, there can be no doubt.

Screaming you epithets from the forum in red and blue lettering with special characters does not give you any more credence than engaging in a cat fight over whether your luck in having a good virus detector makes you correct in stating that EVERYBODY can go where you go and do what YOU do because YOU didn't get harmed.

It is another of your global frames of reference that is logically senseless.

Of course all internet sites are risky... but freedom to post URLs by all comers makes this one especially risky... and NOTHING YOU HAVE SAID CAN CHANGE IT.

You don't have to be stupid to say stuff like you say, but IT MUST HELP.

Oh--was THAT your explanation of how a web site "VETTES" itself?

Not sure I understand THAT explanation. Maybe because it WASN'T one?

Where did I say "everyone can go where I go and not get harmed"? *head scratch*

I DIDN'T say that. I think its hilarious if you cannot find SOMETHING to pick at, you MAKE it up. ROFL!!!

Refer to my previous comments. It IS a risky medium and at any TIME ANY site can be compromised. This is WHY you have a responsibility to have a good virus protection.

Using a good virus protection has nothing to do with LUCK.

No link I post is any MORE dangerous than any place you click on THIS site.

And, as I explained, there is a difference between the Maryland DMV web site which is encryped and has safeguards built in and a SPAMMER who jumps in here ONCE with a link to a site no one has heard of that is SELLING something. The ODDS of someone getting a virus from an unknown site that has no safety mechanisms in place is much more significant than a site like this or a state sponsored site.

The fact you COME to this site regularly does not mean it is safer than anything I post which are, by the way , reputable sites that ARENT selling anything, nor are they asking for PERSONAL information.

Does it mean they can NEVER be compromised? Of course not. But the USER has a duty of care to make sure THEY protect themselves from any and ALL sites.

And, I DON'T expect people to take my word for ANYTHING.

You complain saying I am trying to get people to take my word for things, BUT I categorically do NOT---only ONE of us is using reputable sources to document any position. And it ISNT you, Ms. They VETTE this SITE (whatever the dickens THAT means).

You are griping about red letters being -epithets?? ROFL!!! ---this from a woman who said I have a "berth in hell"---shame on you.

How silly are you.

Every thread is reduced to YOUR complaining about ME.

But you NEVER address the POINT of the thread.

You assume an indefensible position.

Dole out incorrect advice and I will continue to point out why, as a MATTER OF LAW, what you are saying is incorrect.

You NEVER did explain how telling the TRUTH "harms the poster". What you need to say is YOUR UNEDUCATED opinion is that it harms the poster.

But you never prove WHY exactly it harms the poster to tell the truth----that he DOESN'T have a medical condition.

How would you know what was harmful? You don't even know a prosecutor doesn't prosecute CIVIL cases. You've got to be joking.

I would say telling a man to ignore an illegal adoption because his wife "loves the kid so much" would be the epitome of HARM.

You should be ashamed, really.

YOUR opinion doesn't matter.

Blah, blah, blah.

I see your lips moving but I don't know what you're saying.

Darnest thing is--YOU don't know either! ROFL!!