What do I do?

Raise your hand if you are getting WEARY of reading postings that have NOTHING to do with the fact that someone DOESN'T LIKE ME.

WHO CARES?

What YOU think of me is absolutely immaterial to my life. I don't give you OR your opinions of my life a second thought.

Were I to HAVE opinions about you and your personal life, which I clearly do not, THEY should be absolutely IMMATERIAL to you as well.

This isn't junior high. I am not running for pep squad. The fact you dislike me, lawyers, judges, etc. is apparent.

Again, who cares? Do you think repeating it ad nauseam MATTERS any more than the other HUNDRED times you said it?

I had to laugh--another thread in which I did not EVEN post, you STILL posted my name and commented on me--and I never said a word.

Listen carefully: No one cares about your opinion of my morals, ethics, hair, grandma, pale skin, etc. NO ONE CARES.

I HAVE no opinion about your Morals, ethics, hair, grandmother, kids, skin color, etc. AND have NEVER mentioned them ONCE.

Get over it.

NO----ONE---CARES----ABOUT---YOUR----OPINION--OF----ME.

Now...... FOCUS on something else BESIDE me.

Another important point---this isn't a recipe swap where people ask, "What is the best way to cook macaroni and cheese?" There are thousands of ways.

In the law, often times there is ONE correct way. And that isn't MY way. I have NEVER asserted MY way was correct WITHOUT DOCUMENTING from external legitimate sources WHY it was correct, so people could READ for themselves and be INFORMED and make their OWN judgments. MY way isn't right.

THE LAW is RIGHT---even if you despise it enough to call someone who respects it and lives by it "Goody Two Shoes".

Some things ARE black and white. AND those areas are NOT about MY opinion. But about law with which YOU have a problem. That ISNT my fault--I didn't make them.

I REPEAT them. I PROVIDE them for people to read themselves. The fact you have no legal training IS relevant ONLY because you provide incorrect information. A lot of people have no legal training, but they provide helpful accurate information. You aren't one of them.

Get over it. And repeat it as necessary: MY OPINION ABOUT GRACES HAIR, KIDS, FAMILY, HAIR COLOR, ETHICS, MORALS ETC. IS IRRELEVANT, in particular after I have stated it over 200 times.

NO ONE CARES----least of all ME. You are wasting your time, my precious name caller.

The 'Lectric Law Library's Lexicon On
* Quash *

- To overthrow or annul. To nullify, void or declare invalid as in Ôquash a subpoena.¼

When proceedings are clearly irregular and void the courts will quash them, both in civil and criminal cases: for example, when the array is clearly irregular, as if the jurors have been selected by persons not authorized by law, it will be quashed.

In criminal cases, when an indictment is so defective that no judgment can be given upon it, should the defendant be convicted, the court, upon application, will in general quash it; as if it have no jurisdiction of the offence charged, or when the matter charged is not indictable. When the application to quash is made on the part of the defendant, the court generally refuses to quash the indictment when it appears some enormous crime has been committed. When the application is made on the part of the prosecution, the indictment will be quashed whenever it is defective so that the defendant cannot be convicted, and the prosecution appears to be bona fide. If the prosecution be instituted by the attorney general, he may, in some states, enter a nolle prosequi, which has the same effect. The application should be made before plea pleaded and before the defendant's recognizance has been forfeited.