LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums     
Find A Lawyer Now!
Legal Forum

Go Back   LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums > Business Law Forum > Business Disputes
User Name
Password Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Find a Lawyer Now By Category:
Family & Divorce Criminal Defense Job & Employment Personal Injury
Real Estate Lawyers Immigration Business Lawyers Other Lawyers
Be assured that LegalMatch is Fast, Free and Confidential
Not Ready To Hire an Expert Lawyer? Get Online Legal Documents
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2006, 08:29 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5
Thumbs down Enforcing a court judgement

I have won a small claims court award here in Ontario Canada against HJ HEINZ (UK). How can I collect on this judgement? Can I persue collection against HJ HEINZ (Canada) or their head office HJ HEINZ. What good is there in having a judgement if it cannot be collected ? The award was for a default judgement because the defendant Heinz (UK) did not file a defense. It was for damages resulting from a foreign product in found in food (see foreign object in food thread in personal injury forum) Any help as to the relationship between Heinz (UK) Heinz (Canada) and HJ Heinz and as to their onus lies for this lawsuit award. How could I here in Canada enforce this judgement against a UK Company?

Last edited by dufusdog : 04-03-2006 at 09:00 PM. Reason: additional information
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2006, 01:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 456
Default

You will only be able to collect if they have assets located in Canada. That is why it is always better to sue where corp has its principal place of business. If you are having difficulty speak to an attorney who specializes in collections otherwise your judgement is just a piece of paper.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2006, 11:10 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 456
Default

How much is the is the award for? This may determine how much you want to invest in order to collect.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2006, 03:21 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by legaleagle
How much is the is the award for? This may determine how much you want to invest in order to collect.

$2350. CDN$ + expenses total of about $2500.00 CDN$ HJ Heinz is the parent Co. of Heinz UK & Heinz Canada, and I would imagine that they do have assests (Heinz Field in Pittsburgh, just joking of course!) Is a claim against one the same as against all ? Could I add lawyers fees for any attempt to collect this default judgement?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2006, 10:47 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 75
Post Rules for US Collections

Hi Duf,
This link may help you find some answers on how to do it correctly. Good Luck
http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fdcpajump.htm
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2006, 03:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 456
Default

I would assume that in order to collect in the states it would need to be recognized by courts in the states. Then the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act would come into play. I don't think it applies to Canandian judgments being enforced in Canada.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2006, 03:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 456
Default

Also, your judgement is typically only good for the corp you got the judgement against. Say a parent corp has alot of money and bank account is in parent corps name you most likely will not be able to freeze bank account because it is in a different name.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2006, 02:00 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1
Post

Assuming that Heinz (UK) does not have any assets within the jurisdiction then you would be able to apply to the English courts to enforce your judgement. This is a relatively straight forward process however it is unlikely that your application would be granted as Heinz UK never accepted the jurisdication of the original Canadian court (i.e. by refusing to file a defence/ instruct counsel). You may be able to by pass this if you can demonstrate that Heinz UK had "a presence within the jurisdiction at the time of the original proceedings"

If I can help further email me. I'm a UK barrister and I specialise in this type of work.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:16 PM.

Find a Lawyer | Attorney Search by City/State | Law Library
Estate Lawyers | DUI-DWI Lawyers | Divorce Lawyers | Criminal Lawyers
Expungement Lawyers | Business Lawyers | Government Lawyers | Family Law Lawyers  
Real Estate Lawyers | Employment Lawyers | Bankruptcy Lawyers | Foreclosure Lawyers 
Personal Injury Lawyers | Child Support Lawyers | Child Visitation Lawyers | Child Custody Lawyers 
Immigration Lawyers | Landlord/Tenant Lawyers | Defective Products Lawyers | Christian Attorneys
Attorney Referral Services | Intellectual Property Lawyers | Bar Association Lawyers

Attorney Advertising | Law Firm Financing
LegalMatch Reviews | LegalMatch Forums | LegalMatch Family Lawyers | LegalMatch PR
LegalMatch in Austin | LegalMatch Life | LegalMatch Affiliate Program


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©1999-2008 LegalMatch. All rights reserved. LegalMatch®, the LegalMatch
logo, and the tradedress are trademarks of LegalMatch. Patents Pending.