![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Welcome to the LegalMatch Free Legal Advice Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| Find a Lawyer Now By Category: | |||||||
![]() |
Family & Divorce | ![]() |
Criminal Defense | ![]() |
Job & Employment | ![]() |
Personal Injury |
![]() |
Real Estate Lawyers | ![]() |
Immigration | ![]() |
Business Lawyers | ![]() |
Other Lawyers |
|
Be assured that
LegalMatch is Fast, Free and Confidential |
|||||||
| Not Ready To Hire an Expert Lawyer? | ![]() |
Get Online Legal Documents | |||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I purchased a 94 jeep from a used car lot in maui in 2005, for about $6000 over a year of making payments ontime all the time i fell behind when the jeep starting having major problems. When the dealer contacted me about the payment. I informed them that i had hard times because i had just replaced brakes, air intake & filter, and stil had to replace several other parts (body mounts, radiator, emergency break system) just so that i could get a saftey and register the vehicle. I also informed them that the radiator had a big leak and needed to be replaced this was my biggest thing. They said that they could fix it at their shop so that i would have a running vechicle as long as I paid for the towing and cost of repairs verbally estimated at $200. They said that they would have my vechicle back to me with the radiator fixed by the following friday. I went in the following friday and Paid over $400 wich was the cost of tow & repair & partial payment. to get my jeep back. They said that they were waiting to see if i would pay before they would start work ( not what we originally agreed to). Two weeks went by and i called them to see if the jeep was fixed. they said they were still working on it. Over a month had passed and then they finally called me stating that the jeep was done and if i wanted to pick it up i would have to pay $800 to get the vehicle back. I asked to speak with the owner who I set up the agreement with and he refused to talk to me. Over and over again i tried getting in touch with him and he would refuse my calls or not call me back. a week later I got a call from a credit agency stating that it had been turned over to collections.. I am now furious and don't know what to do I only owed $1500 of the original 6000 and they took my jeep for repairs to 30 days to fix it and then repoed it casue they wanted more money. when you calculate it out thats $1200 in a month for a jeep whos payment was only about $250 a month. I also found out from looking at my jeep contract that I am listed as the seller and they(the dealer) are listed as the buyer ( can i use this in any way?) It's not that i don't agree with them about the $1500 owed it's that they held me hostage and are still currently doing so to get money.
Please help i dont know what to do |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I would suggest all further contact with the dealership be made in writing, via either certified or 'signature required' mail. You are entitled to a detailed bill, either from the collection agency involved or from the dealership itself. (I'd contact both places in writing, personally.) I also believe the Dept of Consumer Affairs may be quite interested in the verbiage of the contract you mentioned, especially as you are now listed as "seller." Sounds to me as if you've inadvertently 'signed over ownership' without being disclosed as well. Again, it's probably advisable to have an attorney review everything. In the meantime, you can at least begin by contacting that collection agency. You do have certain rights by law and can request they cease further contact. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, in particular, § 805(c). Communication in connection with debt collection [15 USC 1692c] may be of interest to you. Hope this helps a bit. Good luck. |
|
|||
|
He isn't "now" listed as the "seller", he has always been listed, inadvertently, as the "seller" (in the original purchase document). He isn't listed as the seller on a consecutive document someone is attempting to trick him into signing. Obviously, it was merely a clerical error, not some clandestine attempt at fraud.
A mistake such as calling a buyer a seller and a seller a buyer does not hold the same significance as the same such error might in a criminal trial. If the posters position is that the contract is somehow invalid since he was called the seller and the seller was called the buyer, he has to extend the nullification of the contract to HIMSELF --not just the seller since he , in fact, accepted those terms ( mistake and all ). This means that his possession and ownership of the vehicle is nullified as well. Simply put, if the contract is invalid because of a clerical error, the ENTIRE document must be invalid--not just the part the poster does not like. The signing of the contract by both seller and buyer indicates an acceptance of the terms. The poster cannot fault the seller for not "catching" the mistake when he himself did not "catch" it either. Can't have it both ways. In any regard, this isn't a trial that is thrown out on a technicality or a failure to follow rules of discovery or some other significant infraction. It is a clerical error that did not result in ANY misunderstanding of the terms and restrictions of the contract. "Oh my god, I thought I was the buyer all this time--and I'm really the SELLER??" Obviously, that is absurd. The only time a consumer as recourse against an invalid contract that he or she willfully and knowingly signed is if the error led to a definable and substantial misunderstanding of the terms. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Marketing for Attorneys |
Websites for Attorneys |
Law Firm Financing
LegalMatch Reviews |
LegalMatch Forums |
LegalMatch Family Lawyers |
LegalMatch PR
LegalMatch in Austin |
LegalMatch Life |
LegalMatch Affiliate Program