I don't know about anyone else, but the graceful, gracious, compassionate way you address me in every posting is a model example of how an adult should conduct themselves. Thank you for your shining example. Truly.

I am sorry I missed the part of the posting where the poster asked for (((((hugs))))) or a <<<shoulder to lean on>>> or a :::::Pat on the back:::

The poster isn't here for compassion. They are here for legal advice which they received. The answer to the question is, as I stated, she/he cannot sue for EMOTIONAL distress for a misdelivered package. I not only gave my opinion, I quoted the law in an attempt at helping the OP understand why her position was, as a matter of law, invalid. (gasp--how cruel!!)

Your posting added no legal advice to the thread, only called me silly little girl names. Do you have any idea, dear, of how this rampant jealousy and rapt focusing on me makes you so unbecoming?

I stated: "If I understand your posting, you had a package shipped to the address of someone with whom you no longer want to see. So, you attempted to re-route the package to a different location? How could that be UPS's fault?"

and YOU stated: "You cannot rescind that contract and you cannot get paid for the annoyance of them executing the contract as specified. "

I'm sorry--was there something other than the information I already provided that you wanted to add--well, besides the name calling, I mean.
When your position has no merit, you have to toss something in there, I suppose.

Your jealousy really is unbecoming.

Poor thing.

FOCUS on the QUESTION being asked---even if it already HAS been answered. And thanks for that succinct rewording of my posting, even if you didn't take the time to look up case law to support what you were saying. Guess ya didn't need to--I already did.

No need to thank me. No, really. I insist--keep the laurels to toss at my feet another day.