Quote:
Originally Posted by roadjungle
I have reviewed some of your advise to others and it is truly scary how you and your physic powers can determine outcome from producing past court decisions. The majority of cases are decided in hallways and lunches yet you feel the need to jack up posters and put the fear of past cases in the minds of people that need assistance.
|
Quote a single time I predicted the outcome of ANY trial. Copy and paste my words right here. __________________________________________________ ___
Actually what I said ( after explaining in detail what the LAW says about civil liability-which was the POINT of this particular thread) was that based on that law, my OPINION was that she did not have a case. But, I also said take EVERYTHING said here, including my own postings to an attorney and seek legal counsel. Psychic? pfffttt...... How can they go to court and watch the attorney litigate, when "cases are adjudicated in hallways at lunch"? LOL
YOU CANNOT PREDICT THE OUTCOME OF A TRIAL BASED ON PRECEDENT, but YOU CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT YOUR RIGHTS ARE PERTAINING TO THE SAME by understanding how the courts have ruled in the past. Any successful litigator ( snort ) knows what laws have been already passed and how they relate to the case against or for his client.
REREAD ABOVE, SKIPPY.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadjungle
No I will not state 50 possibilities of outcomes based on any past findings simply because most cases are decided out of court.....
|
Possibilities of outcomes? What does that mean? There are two possible outcomes--WIN or LOSE. (pausing a moment for weighty reflection).
What does plea bargaining have to do with furthering an understanding of case law?
Also, plea bargaining has nothing to do with CIVIL LAW, which is the POINT of this posting---NOT criminal. So, there is no way for this case to be "solved in the hallway". Surely a fine attorney such as yourself understands that. (lmao)
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadjungle
Your last post was once again rubbish since you give legal advice with minimum knowledge of a situation or having any idea what is on the actual police report. You pray on others with no legal back ground other then (possibly) being a student..
|
IF MY ANSWER IS INCORRECT, WHY DONT YOU PROVIDE THE CORRECT LEGAL ANSWER INSTEAD OF COMMENTING ON ME PERSONALLY? Answer that, SKIPPER.
No one here provides POLICE REPORTS--the purpose of this forum is to discuss GENERAL LEGAL PRINCIPLE and (pay attention) CASE LAW.
You don't need a POLICE REPORT to provide a tutorial on what the LAW states regarding civil liability in general--the issue at hand. If understanding precedent is "fear mongering", you are worse off than I thought. Guess what attorneys base their cases on? CASE LAW. Precedent. Guess what judges base their rulings on? CASE LAW. Precedent.
What do you think the Supreme Court does?? IT REVIEWS the relevance and application of PAST LAW and subseqently upholds past decisions, or conversely, overturns the same.
Perhaps you better notify the Supreme Court of your successful past as a stellar litigator, and chide them for their silly interest in the relevance of case law. roflmao
You are no attorney. Attorneys spend YEARS and thousands of dollars---doing---guess what? STUDYING MEMORIZING and UNDERSTANDING the NUANCES OF CASE LAW. No attorney would tell you "cases are settled in hallways". That, Sir, degrades what it means to be an attorney. And as someone who has a graduate degree in criminal law and is in law school, anyone who has the dedication to travel this path does so with reverence and respect for that which has gone before.
If you are an attorney (who cannot tell the difference between advise and advice, or "than" and "then", or "pray" and "prey", an attorney who has yet to reference ANY case law relevant to ANY posters question), then I am Mother Goose.
My challenge remains the same. Cite a SINGLE legally relevant thought on ANY posting in this forum. You have yet to cite a single relevant law, precedent, or even discuss what the LAW SAYS regarding ANY posters question.
Explaining to the poster the law regarding Civil Liability isn't FEAR MONGERING---- it gives her in the information she needs to levy a million dollar lawsuit against the state. FEAR? Ummm, 'kay. If you say so.
If you have no respect for what happens in a court room, why are you here?
Oh, and stop private messaging me. I am not going to answer. I suspect your girl friend would not approve.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadjungle
To clarify I did not notice your roots but my girlfriend did when she peaked over my shoulder and asked "why would someone like that" plaster her own picture as wallpaper? So I guess it stuck. I am flattered you are flattered but you are sooooooooooooooooooooo far from my type I would have to decline your invitation as our past or current relationship has never worked
|
I'm supposed to "stick to the issue at hand"? I'm attempting to discuss case law and you want to chat about my personal WEB pages and my HAIR of all things? I'm stunned you would care enough to not only take the time to view it in the first place, but also comment on it in yet ANOTHER posting. Out of TEN postings you have made, TWO of them reference my personal appearance. Here is a thought---WHO CARES about the color of my hair? I suspect no one--besides you. MY ONLY INVITATION to you was to ask you to post a SINGLE LEGALLY RELEVANT thought dealing with Section 1983, the POINT of this posting.
I still don't understand what my APPEARANCE has to do with ANY of this----(And my background on my web page is BLACK AND WHITE --no brown roots---my hair isn't brown and has never been--it is BLACK) and your comments regarding "our relationship" or "MY INVITATION" ( to do WHAT??) is disrespectful, especially to a recent widow whose husband of twenty years burned to death in a horrific fiery car crash. You are personally repulsive and offensive and your comments border on sexual harassment. You have no cause to address my physical appearance and suggest inappropriate, offensive and disgusting s3xual conduct on my part(i.e. "MY INVITATION"--wth), especially since YOU are insisting upon private messaging Me. To suggest otherwise is harassment with definite s3xual and inappropriate overtones on your part.
STAND DOWN.