For everyone's benefit, exactly what ARE the posters rights? Share what case law those rights are based on, too---we are here to learn from you, great one. (please do not copy from my other detailed postings on this forum regarding Section 1983--do your own research).

Surely everyone here can benefit from your vast experience and wisdom--remind us again--what IS it that you do?

Of course, the poster has rights----and this is precisely why I said ( quote )

"If you feel your rights have been violated, call an attorney who is experienced in Section 1983, civil law regarding police conduct. "

As someone who has taken several classes on Civil Liability in graduate school as well as law school, and still hasn't learned it all yet, I can assure you that someone on the Internet who has never even heard of Section 1983 cannot do anything but mislead, and misguide in a complicated issue such as this--which is why I didn't go into particulars---because it is a vast and complicated area.

Also, there WAS no profiling taking place. (or if your sentence is to be understood as you wrote it--the SUSPECT was doing the profiling--wth) Anyway, if you believe profiling was taking place, state on what basis the profiling was based. Gender? Race? Creed? S3xual preference? Obviously, none.

Furthermore, the police did not have a "bad lead"---they HAD probable cause. What about that is a 'bad lead', do tell?

Interestingly enough, you haven't contradicted with case law or legal premise a single comment I have made, just blathered on, tossing legal words together that don't make any sense. Disagree with my legal advice if you wish--and do what I have done---explain WHY, as a matter of law, my comments are incorrect. Go ahead.

This is hilarious---You tell ME to focus on the purpose of this site--yet you have not cited a single source, law, or precedent. Only begged people to contact you privately to peddle whatever "service" it is that you are supposedly providing.

If someone cannot post their comments here, for everyone to respond to , or scrutinize, it is a good indication that something is amiss. Take anything written here to a LOCAL attorney for review---including my OWN postings. Anyone who offers you 'free legal assistance" outside of this site is not only violating the terms of service of this site, but you can rest assured, they are lying. Period.

Also, you need to be very careful---your comments about you and the "others' ( cough cough ) who are reaching successful legal resolution of the 'problem', who are supposedly considering posting the outcome here---you need to be aware of the legal ramifications of suggesting an attorney client relationship in this medium and in this forum---which is illegal --whether or not you actually are an attorney. Anyone who has actually darkened the door of a law class room knows better than to actually "represent" an attorney/client relationship online, or imply one in a chat message board forum. Thats it, Skip. Go from the frying pan to the fire.

Have you thought about contacting the Department of Corrections--yanno, the one that assigns attorneys to defendants??? ( eyeroll )